This article, dedicated to women invited to mammography screening, challenges long-held beliefs that screening saves lives and reduces the need for invasive surgery. The author, Peter C. Gøtzsche, argues that these claims are misleading after analyzing randomized trials showing that mammography does not significantly lower overall mortality (risk ratio of 1.01). Additionally, breast cancer mortality statistics are said to be biased, with the author suggesting that screening leads to more cases of overdiagnosis, resulting in unnecessary treatments and increased mastectomies. The trend of claiming early detection is deceptive, as many tumors may take decades to become detectable, and screening only marginally quickens diagnosis—promoting a false sense of urgency among women. Gøtzsche points out a pattern of misinformation perpetuated by health organizations and researchers, focusing particularly on the financial motivations driving such narratives. Ultimately, he advocates for abandoning mammography screening due to its harmful consequences and calls for a reevaluation of current practices amid perpetuated ignorance about its actual benefits. The article concludes with critiques of the moral implications of misleading women about the necessity and effectiveness of screenings, urging women to disregard screening invitations altogether.